Navigating Markets

2013 Q4 Commentary: Investing in Uncharted Territory

2013 Q4 Commentary: Investing in Uncharted Territory
“The less prudence with which others conduct their affairs, the more prudence we must use in conducting our own.”

 

-- Howard Marks’ favorite quote

As a portfolio manager, I have two jobs: 1) Define the playing field by understanding risk and 2) Once the playing field is defined, invest in opportunities that offer our clients the best risk adjusted return in order to achieve their goals. Last quarter we discussed our probabilistic approach in defining the playing field and understanding the dynamic of the risk/return tradeoff. This quarter I will update you on our thoughts on risk and share some thoughts on portfolio construction in light of these risks and uncertainty.

2013 Q3 Commentary: Know Your Limits, It May Be Time To Sober Up

2013 Q3 Commentary: Know Your Limits, It May Be Time To Sober Up

One of the first investing lessons I learned was, not to lose money. Not only is it mathematically a problem, as losing 50% means you must gain 100% to return to even, but it has lasting psychological impact that can cause all sorts of opportunities for misjudgment: pervasive fear that leads to selling at the wrong time, a reluctance to buy at the right time, or buy enough, just to name a few. It is nearly impossible to foretell how we will react, therefore if one is interested in earning a respectable return (greater than the risk free return of short-tem treasuries) we must develop what Howard Marks describes as, “risk Intelligence.” It’s the investors’ job to understand, recognize and control risk. I frequently revisit informative writings in order to ensure that the compass needle is pointing in the right direction. This letter was inspired by an article that Howard Marks wrote some time ago, Risk and Return Today.

“The Fed has spiked the punch bowl. You can get drunk on easy credit and once you do you start doing things drunk people do. We’re not there yet, but we’re a little tipsy. People should start thinking about not driving.” – Howard Marks

2013 Q2 Market Commentary

2013 Q2 Market Commentary

Having a small farm outside Sherwood and being someone interested in cultivating my green thumb, we planted a few pinot noir vines last year.

In the vineyard, vintners are often at the mercy of the climate and weather. The delicate, thin skinned, Pinot Noir grape, for example, needs a minimum number of growing degree days, but not too much, as raisins make for poor quality wine.

Both the climate (i.e., location of the vineyard), but also the weather in an individual vineyard, are crucial. So it is with investments.

2013 Q1 Market Commentary

2013 Q1 Market Commentary

The double digit stock market returns we experienced in the first quarter should give us a reason to pause. Being 48 months removed from the financial crisis, we feel investors have developed unrealistic expectations for future returns, which will ultimately lead to disappointment. Given the prospects for future gains, we should expect that dividends will make up more than 50% of domestic stock market returns over the next 10 years. Meanwhile, bonds are underappreciated by investors. This is due to the expectation of rising interest rates. In our view, investors have forgotten the benefits of the liquidity and diversification that bonds offer. Lastly, as has occurred in Cyprus recently, when small and largely inconsequential events occur to the detriment of a few, it should serve as a sober reminder of the risks we regularly face as investors, especially when risks are largely ignored.

Note from Co-Founder & Portfolio Manager

Note from Co-Founder &  Portfolio Manager

Living outside the hustle and bustle of the city on a small farm has its advantages. Besides making it easier to tire our two active young boys, we are also fortunate enough to have the space to grow plenty of fruits and vegetables to cook with and eat. Farming opens up a whole new world of learning, which is truly my favorite pastime.It is also far removed from the temptations and new trends of Wall Street, an absolute imperative for an independent advisor.

How to Minimize Investment Returns, The Rest of the Story

In the previous posting we discussed the ridiculous layering of fees that has occurred in the investment industry. Just what one is paying for, is often disguised through a lack of transparency, accountability and general knowledge. Most advisors, provide pretty financial plans for a fee, charge an asset management fee, broker the investment making to a third party for still another fee, and then use the financial plan to sell insurance products for, you guessed it, more fees. Despite the inherent potential conflict of interest with this model, I always find it amusing that nearly every advisor I have come across, holds themselves out as, “independent” and “objective.” For reasons that may not be obvious to someone with integrity, the law rightfully doesn’t allow for investment advisors to be compensated solely based on the growth of a client’s assets. With that in mind, it is the customers (unfortunate) responsibility to find an advisor who is truly independent and who’s only compensation is as objective as possible (ie. A fee based only on the assets under management). This contrasts with the conflicted incentives an advisor can receive for selling commission based products.

Fees, Fees, Oh Man Fees!

Transparency, and disclosure are two words that are thrown around a lot, but it has been our experience that it is very difficult to truly understand the fees that an investor pays to work with an investment advisor, money manager or even direct with a mutual fund. This is the first, in a two part series intended to shed light on the investment industry. Warren Buffett (Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway) publishes an annual letter to shareholders where he gives his view of the current investment environment, as well as the operating results of the company he has piloted for the last 40+ years. These letters are archived all the way back to 1977 and are a phenomenal source of insight. The following is an excerpt from the 2005 letter and is an interesting perspective: